
Supreme Court to Take on Major Labels’ Billion-Dollar Copyright Case Against Cox
The U.S. Supreme Court announced it will take on a landmark copyright case between Cox Communications and the music industry that has been bouncing between courts since 2018.
The suit was originally brought against Cox in 2018 by a group of over 50 music companies – including major labels Universal, Warner and Sony and their publishing arms – over whether Cox was allowing its internet customers to download music illegally.
A jury originally found in favor of the music companies in 2019, awarding them $1 billion in damages. That decision was partially overturned on appeal last year. The appeals court wrote in its ruling that while Cox was still on the hook for “willful contributory infringement,” it reversed “the vicarious liability verdict,” calling “for a new trial on damages because Cox did not profit from its subscribers’ acts of infringement, a legal prerequisite for vicarious liability.”
Specifically, the music companies originally accused Cox of ignoring notices sent to it regarding its customers’ copyright infringements and of allowing those customers to continue using its internet service despite the notices. “The amount is unjust and excessive,” Cox responded at the time.
In a statement to Variety, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) reacted to the Supreme Court news, first reported by Reuters. “We are confident that on full review of the record, the Court – like the trial and appellate courts did before it – will find that Cox’s willful failure to follow well-settled law contributed to massive infringement of the plaintiffs’ copyrights and will return the case to the trial court for final determination of damages.”
Similar cases have been filed against a number of U.S. internet providers, but the eye-watering verdict against Cox made it stand out among them.
“Congress made ISPs immune from monetary liability if they act with a modicum of responsibility – namely, that they impose real consequences on users who repeatedly violate creators’ rights,” continued the RIAA statement.
The Supreme Court will hear the case over its October term.
Originally published by variety.com. Syndicated material does not necessarily reflect the views of Grazia British.
More Lifestyle
Millennium Docs Against Gravity Festival Director on How Documentary Film Helps Audiences Find ‘Sense Amid the Chaos’ of Current Events
Poland’s Millennium Docs Against Gravity, the documentary film festival that takes place simultaneously across seven Polish cities, returns for its 23rd edition from May 7 – 17 with a…
Mubi Acquires Na Hong-Jin’s Korean Thriller ‘Hope,’ Starring Michael Fassbender, Alicia Vikander and Hoyeon, For Multiple Territories Ahead of Cannes Premiere
Mubi is once again flexing it financial muscle ahead of Cannes, picking up one of the buzziest films heading to this year’s festival. The arthouse distributor and production company has…
MetFilm Sales Acquires Mongolian Documentary ‘Colors of White Rock’ Ahead of World Premiere at Tribeca (EXCLUSIVE)
London-based MetFilm Sales has acquired Mongolian filmmaker Khoroldorj Choijoovanchig’s debut feature documentary “Colors of White Rock” for worldwide sales representation. The film will…
Brit Detective Drama ‘Bergerac’ Bought for U.S. by PBS Distribution (EXCLUSIVE)
British detective drama “Bergerac” is heading to the U.S. with PBS Distribution following a deal with Banijay Rights. The acquisition comes ahead of next week’s London TV Screenings, with…




