
Blake Lively Moves to Block Justin Baldoni From Obtaining Taylor Swift Communications
Blake Lively asked a judge Friday to close the door on discovery related to Taylor Swift in her ongoing legal battle with her “It End With Us” co-star and director Justin Baldoni.
In a new motion, Lively’s attorneys asked the judge to block Baldoni’s lawyers from obtaining communications between Lively and Swift, saying they are irrelevant to the case.
Baldoni’s lawyers previously subpoenaed Swift and her lawyers. They dropped the subpoenas last month after Swift’s attorney objected to an “unwarranted fishing expedition.”
Lively’s side is now seeking to exclude Swift from the dispute once and for all, arguing that Baldoni’s team has simply used Swift’s name to generate tabloid fodder without a legitimate legal purpose.
Baldoni was hit with a major setback on Monday, when Judge Lewis Liman dismissed his defamation and extortion suit against Lively and the New York Times. That suit included some references to Swift, alleging that the pop star had taken Lively’s side in a creative dispute about the movie and that Lively had once called the superstar one of her “dragons.”
What’s left of the case is Lively’s harassment and retaliation suit against Baldoni and others at Wayfarer Studios. Lively has alleged that Baldoni and his publicists orchestrated a smear campaign against her after she complained about sexual misconduct on the set of the film.
“The only allegations in this action that were ever remotely relevant to Ms. Swift were in the Wayfarer Parties’ now dismissed complaint,” wrote Lively’s attorney, Esra Hudson, on Friday. “Ms. Swift is not mentioned a single time in Ms. Lively’s amended complaint.”
Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, previously alleged that he had heard from an unnamed source that Lively urged Swift to delete their text messages. That allegation was included in a filing that has since been stricken from the court record, after the judge said it was irrelevant to the case.
When Baldoni’s team dropped the subpoenas of Swift and her lawyer, it was reported that they had “got exactly what they were seeking” and therefore did not need to pursue the subpoenas.
Lively’s side published an email from Swift’s attorney that seemed to contradict that.
“No documents are being produced and no deposition is being scheduled,” wrote the attorney, Doug Baldridge, in an email to the lawyers on the Baldoni-Lively case. Baldridge had filed a motion to quash the subpoena, but agreed to drop it once the subpoenas were withdrawn.
Lively’s lawyers note that if Baldoni’s side did in fact receive something from Swift’s team, it hasn’t been turned over to their own side.
“The ongoing attempts to once again try and use the world’s biggest star as a PR tactic in this matter reflects a public unraveling of epic proportions,” a Lively spokesperson said, “and serves only to distract from the fact that Justin Baldoni’s lawsuits against Ms. Lively, Ryan Reynolds, their publicist, and the New York Times have been entirely dismissed.”
Originally published by variety.com. Syndicated material does not necessarily reflect the views of Grazia British.
More Beauty
Only A Human IMDb Could Possibly Crack These Movie Chains With No Mistakes
The Reel Deal #14 — May 5, 2026 Sign up here to get notified every time we publish a new The Reel Deal! 📬 🎬 HOW TO PLAY: Each puzzle is a chain that connects two actors through the…
The Full Cast Of “The Celebrity Traitors” Season 2 Has Finally Been Unveiled
The Celebrity Traitors is expected to return to our screens for its second outing in October, with the fifth iteration of the regular show due to air in early 2027. Earlier this year, it…
No One Born After 1990 Has Seen 30/42 Of These Iconic Classic Movies
Movies Before 1990s I Checklist Quiz There have been countless classic movies since the birth of cinema, from Singin' in the Rain to The Godfather and so on. This list doesn't cover them…
Did These "Friends" Episodes Actually Happen Or Are They Fake?
I'll be there for you! View Entire Post › Source link

