LinkedIn settles antitrust lawsuit, agrees to contracting changes
Business social network LinkedIn has agreed to make temporary changes to its contracting practices to settle a lawsuit by US users who claimed it schemed to prevent potential rivals from entering the market.
The preliminary class action settlement, which does not include a financial payment, was filed on Jul 11 in the federal court in San Francisco and requires a judge’s approval.
LinkedIn was accused in the 2022 lawsuit of illegally fashioning some business contracts to bar third-parties from competing with the company, allowing it to overcharge for premium services and upgraded account features.
The plaintiffs said LinkedIn, now owned by Microsoft, was “effectively paying potential competitors not to enter the market.”
LinkedIn did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Microsoft was not a defendant. LinkedIn denied any wrongdoing.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers declined to comment.
BT in your inbox

Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Under the terms of the deal, LinkedIn said for three years it will not enforce provisions in current or future contracts for “application programming interfaces” that would restrict a third-party potential rival from competing.
The contracts at issue in the lawsuit allowed LinkedIn business partners to access private user data “in exchange for restraints against competing with LinkedIn,” according to the settlement filing.
The plaintiffs said the pause would allow potential rivals to compete more effectively, facilitate reduced prices and increase consumer choice.
There are about nine million people in the settlement class, which includes LinkedIn members who purchased LinkedIn Premium services between Jan 13, 2018, and the present, according to the settlement.
Members of the class can opt out of the settlement to sue individually for alleged damages, the settlement said.
The plaintiffs said they planned to present expert testimony at the time of final approval to show the overall value of the settlement, since there is no money being paid to LinkedIn users.
The plaintiffs’ lawyers said they would seek up to US$4 million in legal fees. REUTERS
Originally published by businesstimes.com.sg. Syndicated material does not necessarily reflect the views of Grazia British.
More Fashion
LEESA ROWLAND From Hollywood to the Unknown: The Producer, Writer, Actress and Model Creating Her Own Next Chapter
Leesa Rowland has never been defined by just one role. Actress. Model. Writer. Producer. Author. Creative visionary. Philanthropist. Each title represents a different part of a career…
The Rise of Trevor Dutch: Strength, Style and Substance
From New York City to Europe’s Fashion Capitals, Trevor Dutch Is Bringing Strength, Sophistication, and Individuality to Every Frame In a city that never slows down, Trevor Dutch has…
Commentary: This year's Met Gala proved one thing: The real devil who wears Prada is Jeff Bezos
Apparently not content with bankrupting Sears, Toys R Us, Radio Shack and countless other businesses; buying and then maiming the Washington Post; and leading the Tech Bro right turn to…
Bald eagle 'massaging' its mate? AI deepfakes collide with the laws of the wild
Shadow gingerly places one taloned foot, then the other, on Jackie as she hunkers down on the nest. With Big Bear Lake glittering in the distance, he raises each foot in a kneading motion…




