
People Are Mad Over The “Wuthering Heights” Casting Director's Latest Comments About The Movie, And I Get It
Wuthering Heights Casting Director On Jacob Elordi Backlash
For context, many feel that 34-year-old Margot is too old to play 18-year-old Catherine Earnshaw, while Jacob is probably too white to play Heathcliff, the foster son of the Earnshaw family, who is described early in the book as “dark-skinned.”
All in all, the consensus is that neither Jacob nor Margot, who are both Australian, are the right fit for the roles based on how they’re described in the book. And now, off the back of the first batch of photographs of the pair together in costume on set, the film’s casting director has weighed in on the widespread criticism.
Speaking at a Q&A session during the Sands Film Festival in Scotland over the weekend, Kharmel Cochrane — who notably worked with Jacob and Margot on Emerald’s Saltburn in 2023 — argued that the actors don’t need to look exactly how the characters are described in the original text because “it’s just a book.”
“There was one Instagram comment that said the casting director should be shot,” she said, talking about the backlash more specifically. “But just wait till you see it, and then you can decide whether you want to shoot me or not. But you really don’t need to be accurate. It’s just a book. That is not based on real life. It’s all art.”
Aside from the castings, Kharmel hinted at some potentially “even more shocking” differences between the book and upcoming film, saying, “there’s definitely going to be some English Lit fans that are not going to be happy.” “Wait until you see the set design because that is even more shocking,” she teased. “And there may or may not be a dog collar in it.”
Well, as a former English Lit student, that was a liiiittle painful to hear — and it sounds like I’m not the only one feeling odd about Kharmel’s latest comments. Many fans on X have pointed out that it’s a bold choice to describe Wuthering Heights as “just a book,” when you consider that it was Emily Brontë’s only novel, published at a time when very few women’s writing saw the light of day, and is widely lauded as a masterpiece.
On top of that, Kharmel’s quips about the reactions of “English Lit fans” are also bound to “alienate” what will likely be the movie’s primary audience of — you guessed it — English Lit fans.
I have to say, I’m with the people on this one. What do you think of her comments? Is it arrogance, or are they just enjoying pushing the boundaries of making a movie adaptation? LMK your thoughts.
Originally published by buzzfeed.com. Syndicated material does not necessarily reflect the views of Grazia British.
More Beauty
Only A Human IMDb Could Possibly Crack These Movie Chains With No Mistakes
The Reel Deal #14 — May 5, 2026 Sign up here to get notified every time we publish a new The Reel Deal! 📬 🎬 HOW TO PLAY: Each puzzle is a chain that connects two actors through the…
The Full Cast Of “The Celebrity Traitors” Season 2 Has Finally Been Unveiled
The Celebrity Traitors is expected to return to our screens for its second outing in October, with the fifth iteration of the regular show due to air in early 2027. Earlier this year, it…
No One Born After 1990 Has Seen 30/42 Of These Iconic Classic Movies
Movies Before 1990s I Checklist Quiz There have been countless classic movies since the birth of cinema, from Singin' in the Rain to The Godfather and so on. This list doesn't cover them…
Did These "Friends" Episodes Actually Happen Or Are They Fake?
I'll be there for you! View Entire Post › Source link

